The editors of “Artificial Poetry” are projecting meaning that isn’t actually there onto the AI-generated poems. They are doing this by cherry-picking the poems that they think are the best and then interpreting them in a way that makes them seem more profound than they actually are. For example, they claim that one of the poems is about “the beauty of the natural world,” even though the poem itself makes no mention of nature whatsoever. They are essentially making up a story about what the poem is about and then trying to pass it off as fact. This is a problem because it means that the editors are not actually providing an accurate representation of what the AI-generated poems are actually like. They are instead creating their own version of reality that is not based in reality. This is misleading and dangerous because it gives people false expectations about what these poems are actually like. It is important to be critical of the “Artificial Poetry” editors and to not take their word for it when it comes to the meaning of the AI-generated poems. Be sure to read the poems for yourself and form your own opinion about what they mean.